1963 MG 1100 vs. 2008 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2008 Toyota Camry is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 2,362 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Camry weights approximately 567 kg more than 1963 MG 1100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Toyota Camry (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2008 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1963 MG 1100 | 2008 Toyota Camry | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | 1100 | Camry |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 2362 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 83 Nm | 218 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1392 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2730 mm |