1963 MG 1100 vs. 2009 Toyota Highlander
To start off, 2009 Toyota Highlander is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Toyota Highlander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Toyota Highlander (266 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 213 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Highlander should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Toyota Highlander (249 Nm @ 4700 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Toyota Highlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1963 MG 1100 | 2009 Toyota Highlander | |
Make | MG | Toyota |
Model | 1100 | Highlander |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 249 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |