1963 MG 1100 vs. 2012 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2012 Fiat Bravo is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,367 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Fiat Bravo (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1963 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1963 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 525 kg more than 1963 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2012 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
1963 MG 1100 | 2012 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | MG | Fiat |
Model | 1100 | Bravo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1098 cc | 1367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 83 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 825 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1540 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2610 mm |