1963 Mini MK I vs. 1992 Toyota Camry
To start off, 1992 Toyota Camry is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mini MK I would be higher. At 2,958 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Toyota Camry is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Toyota Camry (129 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1963 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Toyota Camry should accelerate faster than 1963 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Toyota Camry weights approximately 930 kg more than 1963 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Toyota Camry (142 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1992 Toyota Camry will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Mini MK I | 1992 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Mini | Toyota |
Model | MK I | Camry |
Year Released | 1963 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 848 cc | 2958 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 60 Nm | 142 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1545 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2630 mm |