1963 Mini MK I vs. 2005 Opel Meriva
To start off, 2005 Opel Meriva is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Mini MK I would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Opel Meriva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Opel Meriva (100 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 66 more horse power than 1963 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Opel Meriva should accelerate faster than 1963 Mini MK I. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Opel Meriva weights approximately 585 kg more than 1963 Mini MK I. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Opel Meriva (220 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Mini MK I. (60 Nm). This means 2005 Opel Meriva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Mini MK I | 2005 Opel Meriva | |
| Make | Mini | Opel |
| Model | MK I | Meriva |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 848 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 60 Nm | 220 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 615 kg | 1200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3060 mm | 4050 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 2840 mm |
