1963 Moretti 2500 vs. 1968 Triumph 2.5
To start off, 1968 Triumph 2.5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Moretti 2500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Moretti 2500 would be higher. At 2,498 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Triumph 2.5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (150 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1963 Moretti 2500. (143 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Triumph 2.5 should accelerate faster than 1963 Moretti 2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Moretti 2500 weights approximately 187 kg more than 1968 Triumph 2.5.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Triumph 2.5 (222 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Moretti 2500. (187 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1968 Triumph 2.5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Moretti 2500.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Moretti 2500 | 1968 Triumph 2.5 | |
| Make | Moretti | Triumph |
| Model | 2500 | 2.5 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2453 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 150 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 187 Nm | 222 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1133 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |
