1963 Morgan 4 vs. 2002 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2002 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,906 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Dodge Ram (174 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1963 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1410 kg more than 1963 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Morgan 4 | 2002 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Morgan | Dodge |
Model | 4 | Ram |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 3906 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 174 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 2030 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2790 mm |