1963 Morgan 4 vs. 2005 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2005 Toyota Matrix is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,794 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (123 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1963 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1963 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Matrix weights approximately 685 kg more than 1963 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 Morgan 4. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Morgan 4 | 2005 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Morgan | Toyota |
Model | 4 | Matrix |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1794 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1345 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2610 mm |