1963 Morgan 4 vs. 2005 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2005 Toyota Tundra is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Tundra (282 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 227 more horse power than 1963 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1368 kg more than 1963 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Morgan 4 | 2005 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Morgan | Toyota |
Model | 4 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 5550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 3270 mm |