1963 Morgan 4 vs. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic
To start off, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Renault Grand Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic (131 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1963 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic should accelerate faster than 1963 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Renault Grand Scenic weights approximately 1040 kg more than 1963 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Morgan 4 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Morgan 4. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Renault Grand Scenic, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Morgan 4 | 2006 Renault Grand Scenic | |
| Make | Morgan | Renault |
| Model | 4 | Grand Scenic |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1340 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 131 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1700 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 2090 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1640 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2740 mm |
