1963 Morgan 4 vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morgan 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morgan 4 would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (362 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1963 Morgan 4. (55 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1963 Morgan 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Falcon weights approximately 1044 kg more than 1963 Morgan 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Morgan 4 | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Morgan | Ford |
Model | 4 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1340 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 362 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 660 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3670 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1430 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2838 mm |