1963 Morris Oxford vs. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 4,261 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger (163 HP) has 103 more horse power than 1963 Morris Oxford. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 1963 Morris Oxford. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 10 kg more than 1963 Morris Oxford. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Morris Oxford | 1965 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Morris | Sunbeam |
Model | Oxford | Tiger |
Year Released | 1963 | 1965 |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 4261 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 163 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1130 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 27 L |