1963 Morris Oxford vs. 2006 Nissan Hardbody
To start off, 2006 Nissan Hardbody is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Morris Oxford. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Morris Oxford would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Nissan Hardbody is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (123 HP) has 63 more horse power than 1963 Morris Oxford. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Nissan Hardbody should accelerate faster than 1963 Morris Oxford.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Nissan Hardbody (174 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Morris Oxford. (122 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2006 Nissan Hardbody will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Morris Oxford.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Morris Oxford | 2006 Nissan Hardbody | |
Make | Morris | Nissan |
Model | Oxford | Hardbody |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1622 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 123 HP |
Torque | 122 Nm | 174 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.3:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 90 L |