1963 Nissan Bluebird vs. 2009 Volvo V50
To start off, 2009 Volvo V50 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 2,521 cc (5 cylinders), 2009 Volvo V50 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volvo V50 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. (53 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volvo V50 should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Volvo V50 weights approximately 698 kg more than 1963 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Bluebird | 2009 Volvo V50 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Bluebird | V50 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1189 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1598 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2650 mm |