1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 1969 Toyota Corona
To start off, 1969 Toyota Corona is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,707 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Toyota Corona is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Toyota Corona (95 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Toyota Corona should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 115 kg more than 1969 Toyota Corona.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Toyota Corona (137 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1969 Toyota Corona will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 1969 Toyota Corona | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Corona |
Year Released | 1963 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1707 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 95 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 137 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2740 mm |