1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 1980 Lancia Trevi
To start off, 1980 Lancia Trevi is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,585 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Lancia Trevi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Lancia Trevi (100 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Lancia Trevi should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Lancia Trevi weights approximately 60 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1980 Lancia Trevi (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1980 Lancia Trevi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Nissan Cedric | 1980 Lancia Trevi | |
| Make | Nissan | Lancia |
| Model | Cedric | Trevi |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1585 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1145 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2550 mm |
