1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2001 Holden Zafira
To start off, 2001 Holden Zafira is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Holden Zafira is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Holden Zafira (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 85 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Holden Zafira should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Holden Zafira weights approximately 379 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Holden Zafira (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 88 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Holden Zafira will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2001 Holden Zafira | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Cedric | Zafira |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 145 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1464 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |