1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2001 Proton 300
To start off, 2001 Proton 300 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Proton 300 (75 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Proton 300 should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 47 kg more than 2001 Proton 300.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 7 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Proton 300. (108 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Proton 300.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2001 Proton 300 | |
Make | Nissan | Proton |
Model | Cedric | 300 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 75 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 108 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1038 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2450 mm |