1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2001 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2001 Smart ForTwo is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 2001 Smart ForTwo. (40 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2001 Smart ForTwo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 270 kg more than 2001 Smart ForTwo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Smart ForTwo. (100 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1963 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Smart ForTwo.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2001 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Nissan | Smart |
Model | Cedric | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 798 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 40 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 100 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 2510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 1820 mm |