1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2001 Toyota Avensis
To start off, 2001 Toyota Avensis is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Avensis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Avensis (148 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Avensis should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Avensis weights approximately 375 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2001 Toyota Avensis (192 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2001 Toyota Avensis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2001 Toyota Avensis | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Avensis |
Year Released | 1963 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1460 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2710 mm |