1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2003 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2003 Suzuki Swift is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Nissan Cedric (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2003 Suzuki Swift. (52 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1963 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 2003 Suzuki Swift. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 345 kg more than 2003 Suzuki Swift. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Suzuki Swift. (76 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1963 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Suzuki Swift.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2003 Suzuki Swift | |
Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
Model | Cedric | Swift |
Year Released | 1963 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 76 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2270 mm |