1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (97 HP @ 3750 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 30 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Renault Clio (127 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 12 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2005 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Nissan Cedric | 2005 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Cedric | Clio |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1390 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 97 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 127 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1055 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2630 mm |
