1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2007 Volvo S40
To start off, 2007 Volvo S40 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,519 cc (5 cylinders), 2007 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Volvo S40 (217 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2007 Volvo S40 weights approximately 455 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Volvo S40 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2007 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2007 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Nissan | Volvo |
Model | Cedric | S40 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2007 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2519 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 320 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2550 mm |