1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2008 Holden UTE
To start off, 2008 Holden UTE is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Holden UTE (357 HP) has 297 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Holden UTE (530 Nm) has 415 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2008 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2008 Holden UTE | |
Make | Nissan | Holden |
Model | Cedric | UTE |
Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 357 HP |
Torque | 115 Nm | 530 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |