1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2008 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2008 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Volkswagen Polo (200 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Volkswagen Polo weights approximately 136 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Volkswagen Polo. (85 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 1963 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Volkswagen Polo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Nissan Cedric | 2008 Volkswagen Polo | |
| Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
| Model | Cedric | Polo |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2008 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1984 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 200 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1221 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4220 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2470 mm |
