1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2009 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Volkswagen Polo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (149 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Volkswagen Polo should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Volkswagen Polo (220 Nm @ 1950 RPM) has 105 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Volkswagen Polo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Nissan | Volkswagen |
Model | Cedric | Polo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1781 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1950 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2470 mm |