1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva (134 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva weights approximately 645 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva (221 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 106 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Cedric | Captiva |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 221 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2710 mm |