1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Orlando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (128 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Chevrolet Orlando weights approximately 580 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Orlando (315 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 200 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Orlando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Nissan | Chevrolet |
Model | Cedric | Orlando |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 315 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4652 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1633 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2760 mm |