1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Citroen C1
To start off, 2010 Citroen C1 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C1 (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C1 should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C1 weights approximately 387 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Nissan Cedric (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C1. (93 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 1963 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C1.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Citroen C1 | |
Make | Nissan | Citroen |
Model | Cedric | C1 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 93 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1472 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3440 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2350 mm |