1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Dodge Charger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Charger is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Charger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Charger (368 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 308 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Charger should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Charger weights approximately 768 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Charger (535 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Charger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Dodge Charger | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | Cedric | Charger |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 368 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 535 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1853 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5083 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1892 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1478 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3048 mm |