1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2010 Honda Odyssey is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Honda Odyssey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Honda Odyssey (244 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 184 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Honda Odyssey should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Honda Odyssey weights approximately 990 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Honda Odyssey (332 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Honda Odyssey will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Honda Odyssey | |
Make | Nissan | Honda |
Model | Cedric | Odyssey |
Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 244 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 332 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 2075 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5133 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1958 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1778 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3000 mm |