1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi
To start off, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Suzuki Kizashi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (185 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 125 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Suzuki Kizashi weights approximately 385 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Suzuki Kizashi (230 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Suzuki Kizashi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Suzuki Kizashi | |
| Make | Nissan | Suzuki |
| Model | Cedric | Kizashi |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 185 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 230 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1470 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4651 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1481 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
