1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Acura CSX
To start off, 2011 Acura CSX is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Acura CSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Acura CSX (155 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Acura CSX should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Acura CSX weights approximately 228 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Acura CSX (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Acura CSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Acura CSX | |
Make | Nissan | Acura |
Model | Cedric | CSX |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1313 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4544 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1752 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1435 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |