1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2011 Fiat Bravo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Fiat Bravo (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 103 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 350 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Fiat Bravo (361 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2011 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Nissan | Fiat |
Model | Cedric | Bravo |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1956 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 361 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2610 mm |