1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 88 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 205 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 Nissan Cedric | 2011 Holden Epica | |
| Make | Nissan | Holden |
| Model | Cedric | Epica |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1991 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 60 HP | 148 HP |
| Torque | 115 Nm | 320 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4805 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2700 mm |
