1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Audi A1
To start off, 2012 Audi A1 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A1 (104 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 44 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A1 should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 45 kg more than 2012 Audi A1.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi A1 (250 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 135 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Audi A1 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Audi A1 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Cedric | A1 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 104 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 250 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 3954 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1416 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2469 mm |