1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (288 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 228 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 798 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 238 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Nissan | Dodge |
Model | Cedric | CHARGER |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6350 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 1883 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3052 mm |