1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,013 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (370 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 1404 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (508 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 393 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Make | Nissan | Land Rover |
Model | Cedric | Range Rover Sport |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 2013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 370 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 508 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 2489 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 4783 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2158 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1784 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2745 mm |