1963 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2013 Toyota Tundra is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota Tundra (376 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 316 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 1401 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 429 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2013 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1963 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | Tundra |
Year Released | 1963 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1488 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 376 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 115 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1085 kg | 2486 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4420 mm | 5810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 3700 mm |