1963 NSU 1000 C vs. 1969 Zastava 1500

To start off, 1969 Zastava 1500 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 1,294 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Zastava 1500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Zastava 1500 (53 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Zastava 1500 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Zastava 1500 weights approximately 340 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Zastava 1500 (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Zastava 1500 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C.

Compare all specifications: