1963 NSU 1000 C vs. 1995 Toyota Starlet
To start off, 1995 Toyota Starlet is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 1,331 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Toyota Starlet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Toyota Starlet (127 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Starlet should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Toyota Starlet weights approximately 326 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 NSU 1000 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1995 Toyota Starlet, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Toyota Starlet (162 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1995 Toyota Starlet will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C. 1995 Toyota Starlet has automatic transmission and 1963 NSU 1000 C has manual transmission. 1963 NSU 1000 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1995 Toyota Starlet will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 NSU 1000 C | 1995 Toyota Starlet | |
| Make | NSU | Toyota |
| Model | 1000 C | Starlet |
| Year Released | 1963 | 1995 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 996 cc | 1331 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 127 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 162 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 74 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.6 mm | 77.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2310 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 45 L |
