1963 NSU 1000 C vs. 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph
To start off, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 5,379 cc (12 cylinders), 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (318 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 279 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph weights approximately 1664 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (489 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 420 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C. 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph has automatic transmission and 1963 NSU 1000 C has manual transmission. 1963 NSU 1000 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 NSU 1000 C | 2000 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph | |
| Make | NSU | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 1000 C | Silver Seraph |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 996 cc | 5379 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 318 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 489 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3900 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 66.6 mm | 79 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 2304 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1940 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 3070 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 94 L |
