1963 NSU 1000 C vs. 2002 Acura RSX
To start off, 2002 Acura RSX is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Acura RSX (158 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Acura RSX weights approximately 582 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 NSU 1000 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Acura RSX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Acura RSX (191 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 122 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Acura RSX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C. 2002 Acura RSX has automatic transmission and 1963 NSU 1000 C has manual transmission. 1963 NSU 1000 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Acura RSX will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1963 NSU 1000 C | 2002 Acura RSX | |
Make | NSU | Acura |
Model | 1000 C | RSX |
Year Released | 1963 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.6 mm | 86 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.5:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1222 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 50 L |