1963 NSU 1000 C vs. 2005 Saab 9000
To start off, 2005 Saab 9000 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 2,288 cc, 2005 Saab 9000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Saab 9000 (115 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Saab 9000 weights approximately 945 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 NSU 1000 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Saab 9000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Saab 9000 (280 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm). This means 2005 Saab 9000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 NSU 1000 C | 2005 Saab 9000 | |
| Make | NSU | Saab |
| Model | 1000 C | 9000 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 996 cc | 2288 cc |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 115 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 640 kg | 1585 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 61 L |
