1963 NSU 1000 C vs. 2010 Peugeot 3008
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 3008 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Peugeot 3008 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (154 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Because 2010 Peugeot 3008 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 NSU 1000 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 3008 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Peugeot 3008 (240 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 171 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2010 Peugeot 3008 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Compare all specifications:
| 1963 NSU 1000 C | 2010 Peugeot 3008 | |
| Make | NSU | Peugeot |
| Model | 1000 C | 3008 |
| Year Released | 1963 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 996 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 39 HP | 154 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
| Torque | 69 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Top Speed | 130 km/hour | 201 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4365 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1837 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1639 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2613 mm |
