1963 NSU 1000 C vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 381 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Because 2011 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 NSU 1000 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 361 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Compare all specifications:
1963 NSU 1000 C | 2011 Audi R8 | |
Make | NSU | Audi |
Model | 1000 C | R8 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Rear | Middle |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 69 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 90 L |