1963 NSU 1000 C vs. 2012 Audi A4
To start off, 2012 Audi A4 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Audi A4 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A4 (175 HP) has 136 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A4 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Because 1963 NSU 1000 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 NSU 1000 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1963 NSU 1000 C | 2012 Audi A4 | |
Make | NSU | Audi |
Model | 1000 C | A4 |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 39 HP | 175 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |