1963 NSU 1000 LS vs. 2005 BMW 630

To start off, 2005 BMW 630 is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 LS would be higher. At 2,999 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 BMW 630 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 BMW 630 (254 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 212 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (42 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 BMW 630 should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 BMW 630 weights approximately 1144 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 BMW 630 (300 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (70 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2005 BMW 630 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. 2005 BMW 630 has automatic transmission and 1963 NSU 1000 LS has manual transmission. 1963 NSU 1000 LS will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 BMW 630 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1963 NSU 1000 LS 2005 BMW 630
Make NSU BMW
Model 1000 LS 630
Year Released 1963 2005
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 996 cc 2999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 42 HP 254 HP
Engine RPM 5000 RPM 6600 RPM
Torque 70 Nm 300 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 69 mm 85 mm
Engine Stroke Size 66.6 mm 88 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 10.7:1
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 620 kg 1764 kg
Vehicle Length 3790 mm 4830 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1860 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1380 mm
Wheelbase Size 2260 mm 2670 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 34 L 70 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]