1963 NSU 1000 LS vs. 2006 SsangYong Rexton
To start off, 2006 SsangYong Rexton is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 LS would be higher. At 2,696 cc (5 cylinders), 2006 SsangYong Rexton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (42 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 SsangYong Rexton weights approximately 1245 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 SsangYong Rexton is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 SsangYong Rexton will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 SsangYong Rexton (340 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (70 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2006 SsangYong Rexton will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 LS.
Compare all specifications:
1963 NSU 1000 LS | 2006 SsangYong Rexton | |
Make | NSU | SsangYong |
Model | 1000 LS | Rexton |
Year Released | 1963 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 2696 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 42 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 340 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 86.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.6 mm | 92.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 18.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 80 L |