1963 NSU 1000 LS vs. 2012 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2012 Dodge Ram is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 LS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 LS would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (42 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 LS.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 LS. (70 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2012 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 LS.
Compare all specifications:
1963 NSU 1000 LS | 2012 Dodge Ram | |
Make | NSU | Dodge |
Model | 1000 LS | Ram |
Year Released | 1963 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 996 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 42 HP | 212 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 70 Nm | 235 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 69 mm | 88.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 66.6 mm | 100 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5320 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 98 L |